Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorEl-Sayegh, Sameh
dc.contributor.authorAhmed, Salma Nasser Korany Megahed
dc.date.accessioned2023-11-23T07:52:08Z
dc.date.available2023-11-23T07:52:08Z
dc.date.issued2023-03
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11073/25402
dc.descriptionA Doctor of Philosophy Dissertation in Engineering Systems Management by Salma Nasser Korany Megahed Ahmed entitled, “Decision Support Model for Selecting the Project Delivery Method for Sustainable Construction Projects”, submitted in March 2023. Dissertation advisor is Dr. Sameh El-Sayegh. Soft copy is available (Dissertation, Completion Certificate, Approval Signatures, and AUS Archives Consent Form).en_US
dc.description.abstractAs the demand for sustainable construction increases, the need to update project management practices in order to satisfy the objectives of sustainability becomes more significant. Project delivery method is a crucial decision in project management that impacts the success of construction projects. The extensive literature review conducted identified several gaps such as the lack of a comprehensive criteria list to select project delivery methods in sustainable construction projects and a lack of selection model that comprises that comprehensive criteria list. This research bridges the gaps in literature by developing a comprehensive decision support model that will provide decision-makers with a justified rationale for choosing the most appropriate delivery method for their sustainable construction projects. In order to achieve this, the underlying challenges of sustainable construction delivery were first categorized using factor analysed. These were then used to derive relevant sustainability -specific criteria which consisted of five groups: level of integration, green liability, green team, green criteria, and technology and innovation. Structural Equation Modelling was then used to predict the significance of these sustainability-specific selection criteria to the achievement of project success criteria such as efficiency, impact on client, team effectiveness and sustainability. Moreover, Analytical Hierarchy Process was used to calculate the relative weights of the traditional and sustainability-specific criteria as well as the effectiveness values of the three most common delivery methods in achieving the comprehensive criteria. The outputs of all these statistical procedures were then used to develop two decision support models that incorporate a comprehensive selection criteria list of both traditional and sustainability-specific criteria and the three most common delivery methods. Moreover, a customizable prototype software of the decision model was developed where the unfamiliar operations required in the adopted technique would be transparent to the end-users. A case-study that was administered in the end clearly indicates that DBB is outmatched by the unique requirements of sustainable construction. While, CMR and DB are both potentially competitive candidates that can enhance the success rate of sustainable construction projects.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipCollege of Engineeringen_US
dc.description.sponsorshipDepartment of Industrial Engineeringen_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesPhD in Engineering - Engineering Systems Management (PhD-ESM)en_US
dc.subjectProject Delivery Methodsen_US
dc.subjectSustainable Constructionen_US
dc.subjectSelection Criteriaen_US
dc.subjectDecision Support Modelsen_US
dc.titleDecision Support Model for Selecting the Project Delivery Method for Sustainable Construction Projectsen_US
dc.typeDissertationen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record