• Login
    View Item 
    •   DSpace Home
    • AUS Sustainability
    • Faculty Work (AUS Sustainability)
    • View Item
    •   DSpace Home
    • AUS Sustainability
    • Faculty Work (AUS Sustainability)
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    The Response of Chickpea to Irrigation with Treated Waste Water

    Thumbnail
    View/ Open
    This is a placeholder. To access the document, please use the URL in the record. (112.6Kb)
    Date
    2013-09
    Author
    Hadad, Marwan
    Khamis, Mustafa
    Dakiky, Majid
    Manassra, Adnan
    Qurie, Mohannad
    Karaman, Rafik
    Advisor(s)
    Unknown advisor
    Type
    Article
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Abstract
    In a three-year study, the response of four cultivars of chickpea, Bulgarit, WIR-32, Jordan and ICC 11293 to irrigation with TW (treated wastewater) and FW (freshwater), using surface and subsurface drip irrigation was investigated. Wastewater generated from Al-Quds university campus included black, grey and storm water was treated by small scale pilot plant. The wastewater pilot plant consists of tailored made secondary biological activated sludge process with daily capacity of 50 m3. The influent and effluent chemical and biological quality parameters were routinely monitored and analyzed. The data reveal that the average values for BOD, COD and EC for the effluent are 50 ppm, 136 ppm and 1.4 mS/cm over 2 years period. The results of chickpea growth parameters and the chemical and biological analysis of the seeds and leaves indicate that the cultivars Bulgarit and ICC 11293 can be irrigated with TW without any loss in yield and quality. Factor analysis reasonably favored Bulgarit Cultivar irrigated with treated effluent over other cultivars. WIR-32 and Jordan cultivars showed significant reduction in their growth parameters when irrigated with TW as compared with FW. Surface and subsurface drip irrigation gave similar results in most cases. Soil analysis in this study showed no significant difference between irrigation with TW and FW.
    DSpace URI
    http://hdl.handle.net/11073/8225
    External URI
    https://www.researchgate.net/publication/259471828_The_Response_of_Chickpea_to_Irrigation_with_Treated_Waste_Water
    Collections
    • Faculty Work (AUS Sustainability)

    Browse

    All of DSpaceCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsCollege/DeptArchive ReferenceSeriesThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsCollege/DeptArchive ReferenceSeries

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    Statistics

    View Usage Statistics

    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2016  DuraSpace
    Submission Policies | Terms of Use | Takedown Policy | Privacy Policy | About Us | Contact Us | Send Feedback

    Return to AUS
    Theme by 
    Atmire NV