Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorHegab, Hussien
dc.contributor.authorKishawy, Hossam A.
dc.contributor.authorDarras, Basil
dc.date.accessioned2020-02-23T08:58:10Z
dc.date.available2020-02-23T08:58:10Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.identifier.citationH. Hegab, H.A. Kishawy, B. Darras, Sustainable Cooling and Lubrication Strategies in Machining Processes: A Comparative Study, Procedia Manufacturing, Volume 33, 2019, Pages 786-793, ISSN 2351-9789, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2019.04.099.en_US
dc.identifier.issn2351-9789
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11073/16622
dc.description.abstractApplying an adequate cooling and lubrication technique during machining processes is an important issue which affects the machining system efficiency. Flood cooling offers an effective solution to reduce the effect of the high heat generated during cutting processes; however, it is not a sustainable strategy because of the health and environmental concerns associated with its utilization. Therefore, several cooling and lubrication strategies have been suggested and used as alternatives to the flood cooling. These strategies include; dry cutting, cryogenic approach, minimum quantity lubrication (MQL), nano-cutting fluids, and MQL-nano-fluids. In this work, a comparative study is presented to evaluate the sustainability effectiveness of these strategies. In order to evaluate the strategies effectiveness, five sustainability indicators are used; namely, energy consumption, personal safety and health, waste management, machining costs, and environmental impact. A weighted decision matrix is developed to assess the studied strategies in terms of the employed sustainable indicators.en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherElsevieren_US
dc.relation.urihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2019.04.099en_US
dc.subjectSustainabilityen_US
dc.subjectMachiningen_US
dc.subjectDry-Cuttingen_US
dc.subjectCryogenicen_US
dc.subjectNano-Fluidsen_US
dc.subjectMinimum Quantity Lubricationen_US
dc.titleSustainable Cooling and Lubrication Strategies in Machining Processes: A Comparative Studyen_US
dc.typePeer-Revieweden_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.typePublished versionen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.promfg.2019.04.099


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record