Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorPitt, William G.
dc.contributor.authorAlizadeh, Mahsa
dc.contributor.authorHusseini, Ghaleb
dc.contributor.authorMcClellan, Daniel S.
dc.contributor.authorBuchanan, Clara M.
dc.contributor.authorBledsoe, Colin G.
dc.contributor.authorBlanco, Rae
dc.contributor.authorMelville, Madison
dc.contributor.authorHunter, Alex K.
dc.contributor.authorRobison, Richard A.
dc.contributor.authorRoeder, Beverly L.
dc.date.accessioned2021-02-02T08:30:09Z
dc.date.available2021-02-02T08:30:09Z
dc.date.issued2016
dc.identifier.citationPitt, W.G., Alizadeh, M., Husseini, G.A., McClellan, D.S., Buchanan, C.M., Bledsoe, C.G., Robison, R.A., Blanco, R., Roeder, B.L., Melville, M. and Hunter, A.K. (2016), Rapid separation of bacteria from blood—review and outlook. Biotechnol Progress, 32: 823-839. https://doi.org/10.1002/btpr.2299en_US
dc.identifier.issn1520-6033
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11073/21312
dc.description.abstractThe high morbidity and mortality rate of bloodstream infections involving antibiotic‐resistant bacteria necessitate a rapid identification of the infectious organism and its resistance profile. Traditional methods based on culturing the blood typically require at least 24 h, and genetic amplification by PCR in the presence of blood components has been problematic. The rapid separation of bacteria from blood would facilitate their genetic identification by PCR or other methods so that the proper antibiotic regimen can quickly be selected for the septic patient. Microfluidic systems that separate bacteria from whole blood have been developed, but these are designed to process only microliter quantities of whole blood or only highly diluted blood. However, symptoms of clinical blood infections can be manifest with bacterial burdens perhaps as low as 10 CFU/mL, and thus milliliter quantities of blood must be processed to collect enough bacteria for reliable genetic analysis. This review considers the advantages and shortcomings of various methods to separate bacteria from blood, with emphasis on techniques that can be done in less than 10 min on milliliter‐quantities of whole blood. These techniques include filtration, screening, centrifugation, sedimentation, hydrodynamic focusing, chemical capture on surfaces or beads, field‐flow fractionation, and dielectrophoresis. Techniques with the most promise include screening, sedimentation, and magnetic bead capture, as they allow large quantities of blood to be processed quickly. Some microfluidic techniques can be scaled up.en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherAmerican Institute of Chemical Engineers (AIChE)en_US
dc.relation.urihttps://doi.org/10.1002/btpr.2299en_US
dc.subjectBacterial bloodstream infectionen_US
dc.subjectRapid identificationen_US
dc.subjectFiltrationen_US
dc.subjectCentrifugationen_US
dc.subjectSedimentationen_US
dc.subjectHydrodynamic focusingen_US
dc.subjectChemical bindingen_US
dc.titleRapid Separation of Bacteria from Blood - Review and Outlooken_US
dc.typePeer-Revieweden_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.typePostprinten_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/btpr.2299


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record