Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorMortula, Maruf
dc.contributor.authorAbdelrahman, Malak
dc.contributor.authorTatan, Bushra
dc.date.accessioned2023-08-24T04:17:31Z
dc.date.available2023-08-24T04:17:31Z
dc.date.issued2022-02
dc.identifier.citationM. M. Mortula, M. Abdelrahman, and B. Tatan, “Comparative Evaluation of Membrane Filtration on the Tertiary Treatment of Synthetic Secondary Effluent,” Separations, vol. 9, no. 3, p. 63, Feb. 2022, doi: 10.3390/separations9030063en_US
dc.identifier.issn2297-8739
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11073/25296
dc.description.abstractWastewater reuse is essential for sustainable water management. However, it requires tertiary treatment within the plant to ensure suitable water quality. This project aims to investigate the comparative performance of conventional tertiary treatment (sand filtration) against membrane filtration technology to demonstrate the viability of membrane treatment for wastewater reuse. Sand filtration along with two membrane filtrations, Nano Filtration (NF) and Reverse Osmosis (RO), were tested for their efficiency in removing the target pollutants: chromium, phosphate, and UV-254 from secondary effluent. Standard medium-sized laboratory setups were used. Synthetic secondary effluent was used for comparison among the different treatment processes. The synthetic effluent was compared to the real wastewater to demonstrate the reliability of using synthetic effluent. Evaluation of the role of time and pressure on the treatment efficiency was also examined. Based on the experimental results, RO had the highest removal efficiency for all pollutants with more than 90% removal. The experimental results also showed that synthetic wastewater was reliable in representing the treatability of real wastewater. Time did not seem to have an impact on the quality of filtration. Moreover, as pressure increased there was a slight increase in the efficiency. This trend was observed in all pollutants except UV-254. ANOVA showed different results of the effect of pressure on the removal efficiency in both RO and NF as well as time in NF.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipAmerican University of Sharjahen_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherMDPIen_US
dc.relation.urihttps://doi.org/10.3390/separations9030063en_US
dc.subjectNanofiltrationen_US
dc.subjectReverse osmosisen_US
dc.subjectUV-254en_US
dc.subjectChromiumen_US
dc.subjectPhosphateen_US
dc.subjectTurbidityen_US
dc.titleComparative Evaluation of Membrane Filtration on the Tertiary Treatment of Synthetic Secondary Effluenten_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.typePeer-Revieweden_US
dc.typePublished versionen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/separations9030063


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record