Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorAbdelfatah, Akmal
dc.contributor.authorTaha, Mahmoud Ahmed
dc.date.accessioned2015-06-29T10:15:16Z
dc.date.available2015-06-29T10:15:16Z
dc.date.issued2015-06
dc.identifier.other35.232-2015.20
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11073/7838
dc.descriptionA Master of Science thesis in Civil Engineering by Mahmoud Ahmed Taha entitled, "Impact of Using Indirect Left-turns on Signalized Intersections," submitted in June 2015. Thesis advisor is Dr. Akmal Abdelfatah. Soft and hard copy available.en_US
dc.description.abstractMost developing areas are suffering from traffic congestion problems. The majority of traffic delays in urban areas occur at traffic signals. Over the past few decades, several transportation agencies have been applying geometric changes, through adding more lanes, to signalized intersections in an effort to reduce delays. Because of the limited availability of right-of-way, many transportation agencies have started using unconventional traffic control systems for intersections to improve signal efficiency and reduce overall delays. Common unconventional left-turn control types such as the right-turn followed by a U-turn (RTUT) and a U-turn followed by a right-turn (UTRT) basically eliminate direct left-turn (DLT) movements at the intersection by rerouting left-turning vehicles away from the main junction. Following any of these alternatives reduces the number of phases and the average delay per vehicle at the main junction. However, it adds some additional travel time for left-turning vehicles and some delays at the U-turn locations. This thesis presents a parametric study to evaluate the impact of replacing direct left-turns with U-turns (either RTUT or UTRT). The main goal of this study is to determine the traffic operational performance of each alternative under different traffic conditions. Traffic signal evaluation (Synchro) and simulation (Vissim) tools were utilized in this study to determine the optimized signal timings and evaluate intersection performance for each left-turn control type, respectively. Many parameters were considered, such as the total traffic volume on the intersection, the percentage of vehicles on each approach, the turning percentage for each movement, and the U-turn locations. It was concluded that unconventional left-turn control types have less delay and travel time compared to the DLT, when the U-turn locations are 200 meters away from the main intersection. Also, the right-turn followed by a U-turn showed superior performance over the other left-turn control types, when the U-turn locations are 100 meters away from the main intersection. Furthermore, it is not recommended to have the U-turns at a distance less than 100 meters when using unconventional left-turn control types because of the queue spillback effect. Finally, both conventional and unconventional control types have comparable vehicle kilometers travelled (VKT).en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipCollege of Engineeringen_US
dc.description.sponsorshipDepartment of Civil Engineeringen_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesMaster of Science in Civil Engineering (MSCE)en_US
dc.subjectTraffic Signal optimizationen_US
dc.subjectIndirect left-turnsen_US
dc.subjectMicroscopic simulationen_US
dc.subjectDirect left-turn (DLT)en_US
dc.subjectDLTen_US
dc.subjectRight-turn followed by a U-turn (RTUT)en_US
dc.subjectRTUTen_US
dc.subjectU-turn followed by a right-turn (UTRT)en_US
dc.subjectUTRTen_US
dc.subjectVehicle Kilometers Travelled (VKT)en_US
dc.subjectVKTen_US
dc.subject.lcshTraffic engineeringen_US
dc.subject.lcshTraffic flowen_US
dc.subject.lcshRoadsen_US
dc.subject.lcshInterchanges and intersectionsen_US
dc.subject.lcshTraffic signs and signalsen_US
dc.titleImpact of Using Indirect Left-turns on Signalized Intersectionsen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record