Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorSqualli, Jay
dc.date.accessioned2016-03-22T07:03:52Z
dc.date.available2016-03-22T07:03:52Z
dc.date.issued2010-03
dc.identifier.citationSqualli, J. "An Empirical Assessment of U.S. State-level Emissions and Environmental Emissions." Ecological Economics (March, 2010): 1170-1175.en_US
dc.identifier.issn0921-8009
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11073/8298
dc.description.abstractThis paper uses U.S. state-level data for CO, NO2, SO2, and PM10 emissions and a STIRPAT-inspired model to provide empirical evidence discrediting, at least in part, the restrictionist perspective on the immigration-environment relationship. The paper finds that U.S. states with a larger share of foreign-born residents are associated with lower NO2 and SO2 emissions. While these results do not necessarily imply that immigrants mitigate environmental emissions, they emphasize the importance of addressing the relationship between immigration and the environment based on an objective assessment of facts. Hence, it is this paper's contention that it is empirically unjustifiable to call for restrictions on immigration on environmental grounds.en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.relation.urihttp://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0921800910000261en_US
dc.subjectEmissionsen_US
dc.subjectEnvironmenten_US
dc.subjectImmigrationen_US
dc.subjectSTIRPATen_US
dc.subjectIPATen_US
dc.titleAn Empirical Assessment of U.S. State-Level Immigration and Environmental Emissionsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.ecolecon.2010.01.001


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record