Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorFattah, Kazi Parvez
dc.contributor.advisorMortula, Maruf
dc.contributor.authorIqbal, Fatima
dc.date.accessioned2020-06-25T08:58:11Z
dc.date.available2020-06-25T08:58:11Z
dc.date.issued2020-05
dc.identifier.other35.232-2020.20
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11073/16730
dc.descriptionA Master of Science thesis in Civil Engineering by Fatima Iqbal entitled, “Comparative Evaluation of Activated Carbon and Granulated Blast Furnace Slag in Treating Greywater”, submitted in May 2020. Thesis advisors are Dr. Kazi P. Fattah and Dr. Md. Maruf Mortula. Soft copy is available (Thesis, Approval Signatures, Completion Certificate, and AUS Archives Consent Form). Embargo expires February 25, 2021.en_US
dc.description.abstractRecycling greywater (GW) for on-site, non-potable application can reduce the load to wastewater treatment plants and stress on potable water demand for domestic water supply. However, utilization of GW requires careful treatment to ensure reduction of all contaminants to acceptable level. The conventional methods for GW treatment are expensive and energy intensive. Consequently, the search for efficient and cost-effective treatment has been on a rise in recent decades. This study investigates the effectiveness of granulated blast furnace slag (GBFS) and activated carbon (AC) in the treatment of GW from a residential building in Sharjah, United Arab Emirates. GBFS is a by product formed during the production of iron and steel-making. Since GBFS is commonly considered a waste, its utilization allows for waste reduction. Six configurations, each having a different combination of filter media, adsorbent, ultra-violet (UV) radiation and chlorine disinfection were setup at a pilot scale to assess (i) effectiveness of AC and GBFS in treating GW (ii) the impact of pre-treatment on treated water quality and (iii) the efficiency of UV and chlorine disinfection in microbial reduction. Results demonstrated that GBFS achieved higher or comparable removal efficiency for turbidity (90 – 92 %), BOD5 (76 – 86 %), COD (64.6 – 85.1 %), TSS (66.8 – 88.5 %) and TOC (80.6 – 92.7 %) in contrast to AC. GBFS displayed lower TDS removal (0 – 26 %) in contrast to AC (35.8 – 55.4 %). The addition of filter media prior to GBFS enhanced removal of TOC by 1- 3mg/l, TSS up to 99.1 % and turbidity up to 92.1 %. GBFS displayed higher reduction of TC (0.54 – 2.05 log removal) and FC (1.96 – 2.30 log removal) in contrast to AC. UV efficiency in FC and TC reduction varied in the range of 2.5 – 4.4 log removal and 0.4 – 2.7 log removal, respectively. Finally, human risk reduction performed on TC displayed GBFS combined with pre-treatment achieved lower hazard quotient (HQ) values, thereby producing reclaimed water of lower risk in comparison to AC. The study proved that it is possible to introduce GBFS as a sustainable alternative to conventional AC adsorbent for treatment of greywater at household level for non-potable use.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipCollege of Engineeringen_US
dc.description.sponsorshipDepartment of Civil Engineeringen_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesMaster of Science in Civil Engineering (MSCE)en_US
dc.subjectGreywater recyclingen_US
dc.subjectGranular blast furnace slagen_US
dc.subjectActivated carbonen_US
dc.subjectAdsorptionen_US
dc.subjectMicrobial reductionen_US
dc.subjectHuman risk reductionen_US
dc.titleComparative Evaluation of Activated Carbon and Granulated Blast Furnace Slag in Treating Greywateren_US
dc.typeThesisen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record